Robotics in Implant-Based and Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Abstract

Autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction continues to evolve as new technology and mastectomy techniques become available. Robotic-assisted breast reconstruction represents a growing field within plastic surgery, with the potential to improve aesthetic and functional outcomes, as well as patient satisfaction. This article provides a review of indications, techniques, and outcome data supporting the use of robotic assistance in both implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction from surgeons around the world.

Keywords

robotic surgery - robotic breast reconstruction - robotic latissimus dorsi flap - robotic DIEP

Publication History

Article published online:
03 August 2023

• References

• 1 Freeman MD, Gopman JM, Salzberg CA. The evolution of mastectomy surgical technique: from mutilation to medicine. Gland Surg 2018; 7 (03) 308-315
• 2 Egan KG, Selber JC. Modern innovations in breast surgery: robotic breast surgery and robotic breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2023; 50 (02) 357-366
• 3 Boyd B, Umansky J, Samson M, Boyd D, Stahl K. Robotic harvest of internal mammary vessels in breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006; 22 (04) 261-266
• 4 Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant: first report of surgical technique. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (02) e28-e30
• 5 Chen K, Zhang J, Beeraka NM. et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive breast surgery: recent evidence with comparative clinical outcomes. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (07) 1827
• 6 Houvenaeghel G, Bannier M, Rua S. et al. Skin sparing mastectomy and robotic latissimus dorsi-flap reconstruction through a single incision. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17 (01) 176
• 7 Jeon DN, Kim J, Ko BS. et al. Robot-assisted breast reconstruction using the prepectoral anterior tenting method. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (11) 2906-2915
• 8 Houvenaeghel G, Barrou J, Jauffret C. et al. Robotic versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 637049
• 9 Gundlapalli VS, Ogunleye AA, Scott K. et al. Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap abdominal harvest for breast reconstruction: a case report. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (06) 702-705
• 10 Bishop SN, Selber JC. Minimally invasive robotic breast reconstruction surgery. Gland Surg 2021; 10 (01) 469-478
• 11 Chao AH. Safe and efficient implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (09) e3134
• 12 Clemens MW, Kronowitz S, Selber JC. Robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi harvest in delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (01) 20-25
• 13 Winocour S, Tarassoli S, Chu CK, Liu J, Clemens MW, Selber JC. Comparing outcomes of robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest to the traditional open approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (06) 1221-1225
• 14 Lai HW, Chen ST, Lin SL. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant: technique, preliminary results and patient-reported cosmetic outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (01) 42-52
• 15 Sarfati B, Struk S, Leymarie N. et al. Robotic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25 (09) 2579-2586
• 16 Parcells A, Spiro S. Exploration of robotic direct to implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (01) e2619
• 17 Toesca A, Invento A, Massari G. et al. Update on the feasibility and progress on robotic breast surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (10) 3046-3051
• 18 Lai HW, Chen ST, Tai CM. et al. Robotic- versus endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer: a case-control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcomes, learning curve, patient-reported aesthetic results, and medical cost. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (07) 2255-2268
• 19 Ahn SJ, Song SY, Park HS. et al. Early experiences with robot-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2019; 46 (01) 79-83
• 20 Ryu JM, Kim JY, Choi HJ. et al. Robot-assisted Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: an initial experience of the Korea Robot-endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group (KoREa-BSG). Ann Surg 2022; 275 (05) 985-991
• 21 Moon J, Lee J, Lee DW. et al. Postoperative pain assessment of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral prosthesis breast reconstruction: a comparison with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy. Int J Med Sci 2021; 18 (11) 2409-2416
• 22 Lai HW, Toesca A, Sarfati B. et al. Consensus statement on robotic mastectomy-expert panel from International Endoscopic and Robotic Breast Surgery Symposium (IERBS) 2019. Ann Surg 2020; 271 (06) 1005-1012
• 23 Joo OY, Song SY, Park HS, Roh TS. Single-port robot-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction with the da Vinci SP Surgical System: first clinical report. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (02) 194-198
• 24 Dauplat J, Kwiatkowski F, Rouanet P. et al; STIC-RMI working group. Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2017; 104 (09) 1197-1206
• 25 Lai HW, Lin SL, Chen ST. et al. Robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with robotic latissimus dorsi flap harvest: technique and preliminary results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (10) e59-e61
• 26 Selber JC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (02) 88e-90e
• 27 Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (06) 1305-1312
• 28 Park HS, Lee J, Lee DW. et al. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: an initial experience. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 15669
• 29 Chung JH, You HJ, Kim HS, Lee BI, Park SH, Yoon ES. A novel technique for robot assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (07) 966-972
• 30 Daskalakis M, Scheffel O, Weiner RA. High flow insufflation for the maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum during bariatric surgery. Obes Facts 2009; 2 (Suppl 1): 37-40
• 31 Hindle AK, Brody F, Hopkins V, Rosales G, Gonzalez F, Schwartz A. Thermal injury secondary to laparoscopic fiber-optic cables. Surg Endosc 2009; 23 (08) 1720-1723
• 32 Lai HW, Chen ST, Lin SL. et al. Technique for single axillary incision robotic assisted quadrantectomy and immediate partial breast reconstruction with robotic latissimus dorsi flap harvest for breast cancer: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (27) e11373
• 33 Houvenaeghel G, El Hajj H, Schmitt A. et al. Robotic-assisted skin sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using latissimus dorsi flap a new effective and safe technique: a comparative study. Surg Oncol 2020; 35: 406-411
• 34 Fouarge A, Cuylits N. From open to robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (01) e2569
• 35 Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Ribeiro SR. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with robotic latissimus dorsi flap harvest: technique and results. Surg Innov 2020; 27 (05) 481-491
• 36 Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A. et al. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: feasibility and safety study. Breast 2017; 31: 51-56
• 37 Mittal AK, Dubey M, Arora M, Bhagat S, Bhargava AK. Anaesthetic consideration for robotic nipple sparing mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth 2017; 61 (06) 519-521
• 38 Healy C, Allen Sr RJ. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (02) 121-125
• 39 Hilven PH, Vandevoort M, Bruyninckx F. et al. Limiting the fascia incision length in a DIEP flap: repercussion on abdominal wall morbidity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (03) 1108-1116
• 40 Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA. et al. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (06) 1383-1391
• 41 Shakir S, Spencer AB, Kozak GM, Nathan SL, Soriano IS, Kanchwala SK. Laparoscopically assisted DIEP flap harvest minimizes fascial incision in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (03) 265e-275e
• 42 Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, DaLio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 1519-1526
• 43 Manrique OJ, Bustos SS, Mohan AT. et al. Robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest for autologous breast reconstruction: a comparative feasibility study on a cadaveric model. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (05) 362-368
• 44 Dayaratna N, Ahmadi N, Mak C, Dusseldorp JR. Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest for breast reconstruction. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93 (04) 1072-1074
• 45 Wittesaele W, Vandevoort M. Implementing the robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator Flap in daily practice: a series of 10 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (08) 2577-2583
• 46 Lee MJ, Won J, Song SY. et al. Clinical outcomes following robotic versus conventional DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: a retrospective matched study. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 989231
• 47 Choi JH, Song SY, Park HS. et al. Robotic DIEP flap harvest through a totally extraperitoneal approach using a single-port surgical robotic system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (02) 304-307
• 48 Struk S, Sarfati B, Leymarie N. et al. Robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest: a feasibility study on cadaveric model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (02) 259-261
• 49 Tsai CY, Kim BS, Kuo WL. et al. Novel port placement in robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest improves visibility and bilateral DIEP access: early controlled cohort study Ma. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; (e-pub ahead of print).
• 50 Jung JH, Jeon YR, Lee DW. et al. Initial report of extraperitoneal pedicle dissection in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction using the da Vinci SP. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49 (01) 34-38
• 51 Selber JC. The robotic DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (02) 340-343
• 52 Kurlander DE, Le-Petross HT, Shuck JW, Butler CE, Selber JC. Robotic DIEP patient selection: analysis of CT angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (12) e3970
• 53 Daar DA, Anzai LM, Vranis NM. et al. Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest in breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2022; 42 (04) 319-325
• 54 Pedersen J, Song DH, Selber JC. Robotic, intraperitoneal harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (05) 1057-1063
• 55 Kim J, Lee KT, Mun GH. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; (e-pub ahead of print).
• 56 Khan MTA, Won BW, Baumgardner K. et al. Literature review: robotic-assisted harvest of deep inferior epigastric flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 89 (06) 703-708
• 57 Donnely E, Griffin MF, Butler PE. Robotic surgery: a novel approach for breast surgery and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (01) e2578